Convergence Monitoring in Ansys Fluent

When solving CFD models using Ansys products, there are a number of ways to determine model convergence.  DRD recommends monitoring a combination of holistic (like individual equation residual values) and local quantities (like surface and point monitors) to ensure a stable, converged solution. Residuals are representative of the average error across all control volumes in the model, while local quantities can help you better focus on key parameters in your model.

Sometimes you might encounter a situation where one or more residual does not reach its convergence target, but important characteristic features being monitored have steadied to a particular value.  Often this is sufficient for approximating the behavior you are simulating, but other times you may need to strive for more precision.  To do so, it is helpful to be able to determine where in the model there are locally high residuals that are preventing the overall residual value from reaching its target.

By default, Fluent only exposes mass-imbalance (related to continuity residual) to the user.  When post-processing, this can be found in the Residuals group of variables.

Ansys Fluent software image of residuals variables

To access the other residuals, you need to enable an expert parameter using the console prior to solving.  Expert parameters can be accessed using the TUI command ‘/solve/set/expert’.  Beyond that, the prompts you receive will depend on your Fluent environment, so we can’t dictate a specific list of responses.  However, to enable the remaining residuals you will need to answer “yes” to the prompt “Save cell residuals for post-processing?”.

Ansys Fluent setting image

After solving you should then see more options for plotting residuals, which will allow you to better evaluate where local error is preventing the overall residual from reaching its convergence target.

Ansys Fluent software image of residuals variables

Often you will find this is associated with a mesh quality issue that requires resolution via remeshing, or even a geometric modification in order to improve mesh quality.

Maximizing Your Investment: How to Choose the Best Engineering Simulation Software

Maximizing Your Investment: How to Choose the Best Engineering Simulation Software

Engineering simulation software is a powerful tool that helps organizations use virtual prototyping to reduce design and test costs. However, selecting the right software can be a complex and challenging process. With so many options available, it can be difficult to know which software will best meet your needs.

Our new white paper, Six Considerations for Selecting Engineering Simulation Software, provides a comprehensive guide for evaluating and selecting the best engineering simulation software to meet your needs.

In the white paper, we explore the following six key questions you should consider when evaluating engineering simulation software options:

  • Should I use a CAD-embedded simulation tool or stand-alone engineering simulation software?
  • What hardware is needed to run engineering simulation software?
  • Should I look to conduct simulation in the cloud or on-premise?
  • Does our organization have the personnel to perform simulation in-house?
  • How long does it take to get trained and become proficient on engineering simulation software?
  • Should I lease or buy engineering simulation software?

We review a variety of helpful tips and best practices for evaluating different software options, assessing hardware requirements, identifying personnel capabilities and training needs, and making informed decisions about leasing versus buying. After reading this guide, you will have a better understanding of how to evaluate different types of engineering simulation software options based on your organization’s goals and needs.

Download this essential resource for evaluating and selecting engineering simulation software here.